NEWER POST

To Transfer or Not to Transfer? That is the Question for Unhappy College Co-ed

OLDER POST

A Little Explosion to Start Your Day

Featured, Schools

Johns Hopkins Students Boycott Final Exam — So Everyone Gets an A

8 Written by: | Monday, Feb 25, 2013 10:39am

url

This is amazing: So, like many professors, Johns Hopkins computer scientist Peter Frohlich grades exams on a curve, meaning that everyone’s grades are relative to the top scorer. (If the smartest student gets an 85, s/he gets an A, and everyone else’s score is weighted accordingly.) There’s an obvious loophole, though — if everyone taking the exam gets the same score, then everyone gets an A. Even better, if everyone gets a zero, they get an A. This is exactly what Frohlich’s students did — and it worked.

Every single student in Frohlich’s fall semester Intermediate Programming, Computer System Fundamentals, and Intro to Programming for Scientists and Engineers courses refused to take the final. “The students refused to come into the room and take the exam, so we sat there for a while: me on the inside, they on the outside,” Fröhlich told Inside Higher Ed. “After about 20-30 minutes I would give up…. Then we all left.” And the students all got As on their final.

Activists and organizers, take note:  the final boycotting campaign was masterfully planned and executed. Students used Facebook and email to contact classmates about the boycott, while organizers used a shared spreadsheet to keep track of who had signed on and who needed a little more persuading. The students all showed up prepared to take the final, understanding that if any one of them had broken ranks and sat for the exam, the rest of them would’ve had to do so as well. But solidarity won out in the end.

Boing Boing notes that it’s appropriate that such an “ingenious, cooperative solution” to the problem came from computer science students:  “The story of the boycott is a sterling example of how computer networks solve collective action problems — the students solved a prisoner’s dilemma in a mutually optimal way without having to iterate, which is impressive.”

But aside from all that, it’s once again nice to hear about Johns Hopkins students uniting for the common good. “The students learned that by coming together, they can achieve something that individually they could never have done,” Frohlich said. “At a school that is known (perhaps unjustly) for competitiveness I didn’t expect that reaching such an agreement was possible.”

Leave a Reply

  • Henry

    Much as he might be happy with the unity, I’d have flunked the whole bunch of them. This is the error of over analysis. Rather than test their brains, these kids decided to push their will. Will deserves a push when you’re that age, but not at the expense of intellectual stimulus. Wouldn’t fly at MIT.

  • Tim Windsor

    Exactly. Non-attendance is a DQ, which is a zero, not an A. This doesn’t show cleverness, it proves Emerson right, in regards to the professor: “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”

  • Sam

    http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/14/the-history-of-college-grade-inflation/

    A year old, but still relevant, especially when this sort of laziness is so highly applauded.

  • Ellen B. Cutler

    Definitely flunk them all. And grading on a curve is stupid. My students have to complete every assignment, take every test. Some grading is absolute (tests) and some is adjusted (only slightly) to student ability (papers) in the sense the stronger the student, the higher the bar. What happened here was blackmail.

    • chemjim

      I agree that this sort of curve grading is foolish. It leads to over-competition, and worse, competition against other learners instead of against a scale of success. BUT, this was the system the prof had established. So, if this class (of undisclosed size – 50? 150?) was able to organize this response, they have earned the reward. Engineering is built on mistakes, and I bet Prof Frohlich will revise the requirements on the next go-round. I know I would.

  • Rachel Monroe

    I have a hard time thinking of these students as lazy cheaters, and here’s why: http://www.baltimorefishbowl.com/stories/in-defense-of-johns-hopkins-exam-boycotters/

  • Shaun Sargen

    Why don’t you just boycott the whole semester.? Or better yet your entire curriculum? How about if everyone does this? That would be just great. Then we would have zero accountability, no rules to follow!! What a great world it would be! This mentality is exactly what is wrong with the world. You knew the exam was coming and you knew it was graded on a curve. Sit your ass down and take the exam like you agreed to.

  • t_h_u_g_we_be

    I guess nothing can do damage to the value of undergraduate degrees at this point, as they’re already worthless.



NEWER POST

To Transfer or Not to Transfer? That is the Question for Unhappy College Co-ed

OLDER POST

A Little Explosion to Start Your Day

Most Comments This Week

25

Is There Email After Death?

Written by Marion Winik

Wednesday, Oct 22, 2014 7:39pm

2

Baltimore Judge Suspended for 'Sarcastic' Comments

Written by Robert OBrien

Thursday, Oct 23, 2014 9:01am

Recent Comments

Naomi Shihab Nye
Is There Email After Death?

"You are simply the most brilliant writer I will ever know. Love you, Marion. And loved...

deb doerfer
Is There Email After Death?

"Thanks for the story, my mom is 83 and still "going up the road" to gamble in Delaware....

E
Forget He/She: Going Gender Neutral in the Classroom

"I'm a queer person in Seattle, and many of my friends and others in my community use the...

Susie Fisch
Is There Email After Death?

"Dear Marion, Now, I just want to call my mother to read your wonderful piece to her....

Molly
A Linguist Explains the Baltimore Accent (and Kathy Bates)

"My daughter is "making" me watch AHS with her and the only thing that gets me past that...